Stuck in our bubble
Just the other days I was telling you about the "Information diet" and about being more careful about what information we let into our brains. Also there I was mentioning another book called "The Filter Bubble", by Eli Pariser, about how our online experience is more and more personalized and filtered by the tools or web apps we use online (social media, search engines, online shops). Well, I read it (most of it)!
It's very well documented, it has details about different popular sites that used algorithms to personalize the user's experience (like Amazon, Google) and all this stuff is very interesting. By reading it you understand how the new media works like and maybe you can make a more informed decision about your online experience.
But my conclusion after going over it and looking around on Eli's website is this:
- All these so-called "free" services in reality they are not. You are paying for them with your content, which they use to "improve" their services provided to you and others and the thing is, it's all mentioned in their agreement;
- Nobody tells you how much content to provide, if any, it's your choice, but you must realize that what you're posting now will influence your experience in the future;
- There are some things to do, check Eli's list here, but in my opinion that list is not feasible in a day to day activity and it's not guaranteed (don't forget Google gets info about you from aprox. 50 sources as Eli informs us in his book);
And this brings us to my real conclusion: if you put your content online, you can be sure that it will be used by someone to make money from it and some will do this (it's usually the most popular ones) by keeping track of your moves online and present you content only that matches your "detected" preferences. By doing this, they will limit you to the content THEY think YOU want. And slowly the Internet is no longer the place where you control what you experience, well you do, but not for long.
The main problem with all this (besides the fact that your personal info is harvested in gazillion servers) is that you will never reach the info that you don't show you would like to see, for the simple reason that you don't know it.
I think that we can only challenge more the info we receive and always try to find new sources for our daily dose of 1 and 0, even offline sources (there's nothing better than a nice chat at the water cooler!
).
P.S: for Google users out there, check this out: Google Dashboard. It shows all the info Google has on you (or the info they want you to know they have about you!
) and you can choose to stop the tracking and delete the collected data for each of their products.
Floriade 2012
Name: Floriade 2012 - World Horticultural Expo
Location: Venlo, Netherlands
Ticket price: 25 €
Open: 5 April to 7 October 2012
www: http://www.floriade.com/
SaneBox: tidy up your Inbox
One of the cool tools I found out about while reading the "Information Diet" (see previous post) is SaneBox (if you're in a hurry, check the video).
SaneBox makes sure that you see in your Inbox only the email that needs your attention right away. And it does this in a pretty simple way: moves everything that it thinks that it's not urgent in a special folder in your mailbox and then at a moment of the day/week (chosen by you) sends you an email showing you the list of emails that were put in that folder.
Initially, might be a good idea to connect SaneBox to your social media accounts so it knows most of your contacts, so their emails are prioritized. If you think one of the emails doesn't belong into the "later" folder, you move it to Inbox and SaneBox learns about it. The other way around also works.
In the context of choosing only what matters, cleaning up your email is very important. I don't receive many emails usually, I disabled most of the notifications of my social accounts, but even in this case SaneBox makes a difference, check the graph below.

Besides @SaneLater folder, SaneBox offers you other folders with special functionality like: @SaneTomorrow, @SaneNextWeek and my favourite @SaneBlackHole, when the unsubscribe and spam filter don't work just put it there and forget about it!
If I would be a bit paranoid I would think about the fact that you allow SaneBox to have unlimited access to your email but unfortunately there is no other way to benefit from this functionality (maybe Google buys them and include the features as default for GMail
).
Before you rush on their website to sign up for an account, keep in mind that SaneBox is NOT free and it's about $4.95 per month. If this doesn't change your mind, go on and start with the 30 day trial, see what I'm talking about!
Stop consuming crappy info
Intro
With all the abundance of information around us, sometimes (well, I'd say most of the time) we get overwhelmed. We got used to browse through the tv channels almost without realizing, or checking for a new email each minute, or maybe see what likes and comments we got on Facebook. I must say, all these distractions make harder and harder to focus on the things that MATTER in our day-to-day activity.
Problem(s)
One day, on O'Reillys 'Deals of the Day' I saw one book called "Information diet" and it caught my attention so I bought it. Basically, the book tries to make a parallel between what a diet is for food and what it could be for information that we come in contact with each day. (1) It seems that our brain was wired to always search for new things and this is powered by dopamine. When a new email arrives or a new tweet and the notification pops up, dopamine is released in the brain which makes us to search even more. Because of this, in time, our habits change and soon we will not be able to focus on one thing without checking different websites or our phone or the messenger list.
(2) Besides this valid point about our daily attention span, the author, Clay Johnson, argues that the current media providers made a mission from providing us crappy info (these are my words, not his
). In current days, many media websites apply different solutions to track the visitor and see what he wants to read, what links he clicks more often and show him especially content related to his profile so he clicks more, therefore more money for the media company. Journalists are more like content gatherers paid per article, with a daily quota, to be encouraged to generate as many articles per day as possible.
Basically, the two main parts of the "problem" are social networks and the fact that media providers don't care about informing us anymore, just to serve us content we 'like' as cheap as possible. (3) There is an extent to the second issue and that's serving you content that only corresponds to your online profile, something that Google and Facebook do everyday, they contain you only in your interest "bubble". So if you search for something and in the results is something you might be interested but doesn't fit with the choices you made in the past, you'll probably don't see it in the first results.
Solution(s)
(1) One simple solution for all the distracting notifications from emails, Twitter, Facebook and so on, would be to turn them off. Because, let's face it, unless you don't work in social media or something that requires you to monitor them, this constant distractions don't do any good. But like any addiction, the habit still remains so you should try to make short alternations between work and pause, with the goal of maximizing the work part. Check out the Tools page on the books site, it has some interesting suggestions and I personally like SaneBox, but we'll see more about it later.
(2) In general we should be more selective with the information we receive. Most of the time it is not shoved into our heads, we voluntarily let it in. For sure we can all recognize the crappy medias, because the quality of their content is really low, we should just avoid them, because in the end we are (still) in control. Clay set up a repository on GitHub with interesting books on this matter, personalities from different fields, blogs etc. and we can all contribute to it.
(3) For this matter I don't really know what we could easily do. Clay makes a reference to Eli Pariser's book called The Filter Bubble and there's also a TED talk of his you might want to check out.
Conclusion
Even though the lack of an information diet is not as obvious as for a food diet, I think it has a big impact on our long term life and how we spend our time. I found "Information diet" very interesting, it has many examples and touches other related topics and even if it doesn't give you a guaranteed solution it makes you realize that something can be changed in your life to be focused more on the important things. I dare you to check it out!
Florence & The Machine
The first time I heard a song from Florence And The Machine was while watching an american tv show, something less than a year ago. The starting scene showed the main character (a female spy) running on a field and "Dog days are over" playing in the background.
I liked so much the crazy rhythm and her voice that I used Shazaam to find out who was singing it and since then at least one of her albums (mostly 'Ceremonials') is a permanent resident of my 'offline' Spotify albums. Their music is great for starting a new day!
P.S.: They are doing a tour in Europe this winter, so check out the tour dates.
Random thoughts about ACTA
I see a lot of reactions in the world about this stupid "initiative" called ACTA, it's been in the headlines for some time now. Don't get me wrong, it's what such an attempt deserves, but it makes me wonder, what's next? This subject got a lot of attention everywhere in the world, so it made me thinking what person in its right mind thought that this will be approved smoothly and silently and that they will be able to apply it with no problems.
What I'm saying is that this agreement couldn't be successful ever in this life, so then why would anyone even start it? After seeing what happened with PIPA, SOPA in the US, what chances would this have in Europe, where this kind of initiatives are much less appreciated than in the USA. I know ACTA was started some time ago, but why even try to promote it for a vote in the EU, if the chances are against you?
I don't know exactly how the EU Parliament works and maybe I'm just paranoid, but this ACTA starts to look more like some dust in the eyes, to cover for something else. Then again, I'm no specialist and maybe I'm just paranoid, but we'll see, we're living "interesting" times.
Muzeul trenurilor din Utrecht (Spoorwegmuseum)
Nume: Spoorwegmuseum Utrecht
Locație: Utrecht hartă
Preț bilet adult: 13,5 €
www: http://www.spoorwegmuseum.nl/
Am fost tot timpul fascinat într-o oarecare măsură de trenuri şi mă holbez de fiecare dată curios la "epavele" feroviare de care nu duc lipsă gările româneşti, de parcă ar fi cine ştie ce minunăţii ale tehnicii. Nu am avut ocazia înainte să mă duc într-un muzeu dedicat acestor vehicule, iar Spoorwegmuseum din Utrecht nu e doar un simplu muzeu, ci o fostă gară care a fost folosită câteva zeci de ani: Utrecht Maliebaan.
Stația a fost închisă în '39 pentru că nu mai era utilă și mai târziu, în 1954, transformată în muzeu. Muzeul a fost renovat de mai multe ori în timpul ăsta şi colecţia mult îmbogăţită. S-a dorit ca staţia să readucă la viaţă cât mai mult din atmosfera vremurilor în care era încă folosită. Casa de bilete este în stilul vremurilor şi o să puteţi vedea sala regală de aşteptare dintr-o gară din Haga. Înainte de a ieşi din clădirea sălii de aşteptare, să aruncaţi o privire şi la/în cuferele de pe partea dreaptă, cum staţi cu spatele la intrarea în muzeu, unele au câte ceva de spus!
Imediat în afara clădirii principale a gării sunt parcate la prima linie o serie de vagoane, printre care şi vagoanele trenului regal şi puteţi să le vizitaţi să vedeţi cam de ce comfort se bucura familia regală când călătorea pe calea ferată. Traversând calea ferată şi îndreptându-vă spre hangarele muzeului, puteţi observa singura linie funcţională a staţiei. Din 2003 se poate ajunge la muzeu şi cu... trenul!
S-a făcut legătura între gara Utrecht Centraal şi Utrecht Maliebaan cu un tren ce face traseul odată pe oră, în ambele sensuri. Biletele se pot cumpăra de la automatele de bilete NS sau de la casierii.
Trecând de singura linie funcţională a staţiei Maliebaan, veţi putea intra în adevărata expoziţie a muzeului, un pavilion imens care include o colecţie de vagoane şi locomotive şi o serie de "lumi" cu diferite teme. Puteţi citi mai multe despre ele aici pentru a afla ce puteţi vedea atunci când veţi dori să-l vizitaţi. Neaparat să vă uitaţi la vagoanele şi locomotivele expuse, multe au poveşti foarte interesante de zis, cum ar fi cea a trenului de poştă în care erau vagoane speciale de sortat poşta, care era ridicată dintr-o staţie şi în timp ce trenul se deplasa spre altă staţie poşta era sortată şi pregătită pentru a fi livrată la destinaţie.
N-ar mai fi prea multe de zis, decât că e un muzeu plin de surprize, ce merită vizitat, indiferent de vârstă!
Grooveshark versus Spotify
Let's put it like this: I'm a heavy music listener!
I like to be able to listen to the music I want, when I want, wherever I want and maybe when I don't know exactly what to play, some suggestions wouldn't hurt.
I have another confession to make: I have been using a Premium Spotify account for the last 6 months and I can say I use it most of the time I am awake. Rarely I buy some music I don't find on Spotify (yeah, there are some bands who didn't make it on Spotify, or some albums are not available there, imagine that!). I also subscribed to Grooveshark Anywhere for one month to be sure I don't miss a thing!
So, lets have a look at those 2 great services:
Grooveshark
Pros:
- Extensive social features;
- Information about upcoming events of artists;
- Unlimited usage with only website ads for free users;
- Desktop and mobile client*;
- You can upload your own music;
- Radio mode;
- Large music collection;
- Can listen to music without an account.
Cons:
- Disorganized, a lot of junk content;
- You can't listen to music while you're offline;
* features available with paid account.
Spotify
Pros:
- Only official music content;
- High quality sound*;
- Desktop and mobile client*;
- Very good organization of songs and albums;
- Download songs offline on desktop and mobile*;
- Unlimited usage with voice ads for free accounts;
- Sync mobile and desktop libraries through the desktop app;
- What's new section, see what new albums were released;
- Early access to new music*;
- Extensive info about artists.
Cons:
- Some albums or songs are not available (e.g. album 21 from Adele);
- Voice ads are kind of annoying;
- In order to listen to anything, you need an account -> issue if you share music with someone who doesn't have an account and is not willing to create one.
* features available with paid account.
Last thoughts
Both Grooveshark and Spotify offer free and paid accounts. Grooveshark has 2 types of paid accounts: Grooveshark Plus and Grooveshark Anywhere, both help you get rid of advertisements on Groveshark website, allow you to use the Desktop app, Last.fm scrobbling and Anywhere allows you to use the Mobile app ( you can find more info here). Also Spotify has 2 types of paid accounts: Unlimited and Premium. Both get rid of advertisements and allow radio mode and on top of this Premium brings the possibility to use the mobile app, play music offline, better sound quality, exclusive content and use Spotify on media players (info here).
From what I can see, Grooveshark is some kind of Youtube for audio files, with lots of social and networking features, while Spotify is for people who want to enjoy music without all that clutter. Another important aspect is that Spotify pays money to the artists from the subscriptions and from the advertisements, based on some usage algorithms. Grooveshark seems to adopt a pay-on-demand policy, any artist can create his account there and see how many times his creations were accessed and how much many he will receive. But I'm not sure what happens when somebody uploads a song from different sources and lots of people listen to that. Is the artist getting paid for that?
While I will stick to Spotify and occasionally buy music that I can't find there, I admit Grooveshark has its good sides, but I can't step over the mess is in there. I want listening to music to be about listening to quality music which is easy to access and of a great quality. I also think that services like Spotify might be a solution to piracy, let's face it, 10 € per month is more than a bargain for a heavy listener.
Operation “Turn on lights”
It's 24th of November, 2011 and it's time to start operation"Turn on lights" for the coming winter holidays. This operation cannot be successful without a life and death battle between good and evil. It is happening now in Dam Square, Amsterdam. Check it out!
































































































